Journal
More


Blackberry – Email Goes Kaboom Again! I Have a Suggestion – Get Your House in Order
12/24/2009
By PJLouis
Tags: RIM, Blackberry, AT&T, Verizon, wireless, email, FCC, outage

As a Blackberry user I can and will say this: I was both mad as heck and not surprised. If there was something better to meet my needs I would dump the handset altogether.


In less than a week RIM has had two email outages.


Now you might be thinking I am too demanding. However, there was a time in telecom that an incident like this would have resulted in the mass firings of the top management of the telephone company and the ceremonial execution of the head of operations (being fired and then burned in effigy). By the way, this would have occurred before the FCC and state public utility commission hearings, which would have been held to determine fines and massive penalties. Just makes you wish for the good old days. Sorry I take that back, too much regulation is not what I am seeking. We all know the types of disasters that occur when there is too much government interference. I am seeking some type of industry set defacto standard of performance.


During the first outage, other than a few articles in the newspapers and online news, the big news that dominated was RIM hitting its financial targets.


What I would do now is give RIM’s public relations person a promotion and a heck of a pay raise. To think a continental loss of all Blackberry email and the big news that is dominating the trades is RIM hits its financial targets.


However, thanks to a second outage we suddenly see trade news and mainstream news finally talking about RIM’s complete failure.


Just a FYI. I knew my carrier was not at fault because I could still make and receive calls. RIM’s network is interconnected to the carriers. I knew right away RIM was having trouble.


Thanks to RIM, I am not a happy person.


I run a consulting business. I stay in contact with clients and staff via my Blackberry. Even if I did not run my own business and I worked for someone else like a Big 4 accounting firm running its operational restructuring group, which at point I did, I would still be using my Blackberry to communicate with staff and clients. Corporate America is fuming. The small and mid-size business person is fuming. Time is money and loss of communications is money lost. Should I be billing RIM for ticked off client and money lost?


I cannot blame RIM completely. The consumer market has become jaded and now expects network failures. This type of attitude is understandable because the telecom carrier and service provisioning community has been very good at creating this attitude.


Who can we blame? Someone’s head has to roll for this. I think I am going to continue blaming RIM.


This is not a technology issue. This was and is an operations issue. Get your house in order, or someone like the FCC will do it for you.


There used to be an industry forum on network operations practices. Where is it now? Bell Communications Research (now Telcordia) used to set the industry’s defacto standards on everything in the network. Where the heck is this outfit when you need them?


I am hoping RIM will use these incidents to improve their operational standards and network enhancement procedures. If this becomes the norm for RIM and other telecom service providers, we could be looking at FCC intervention, which I certainly do not want to see. If the carrier community wants to manage its own shop, rather than the government, then run your shop well.

What does the FCC have to do with a Software Company?   RIM is not the network but a software application riding on the network.  Are you proposing that the FCC take control over software companies?   Does the FCC regulate Apple's iPhone?   I'm trying to understand the difference.

As a consumer you can always switch to another product (i.e. iPhone, Nokia, Android).   If Blackberry services gets worse, than maybe it's time to switch.    iPhone have great data service, but good lock making a phone call.



gdt gdt
12/24/2009
According to RIM it was their own fault.  They screwed up an upgrade.  Do you really believe for a second that a carrier like Verizon or AT&T or T-Mobile, etc., will take the ehat for RIM?

The FCC has to find someone to blame.  Do you really think for a second that given email's importance in basic communications and everyday life Verizon or AT&T will take the blame.  I can make the case that all baisc voice telecommunications is software related.  Today there literally is no difference between a provider of email or provider of voice; it is all communciations and they all use software.

In a society where communications is treated as a right the government is not going to let anyone get away with creating havoc with the public's ability to communicate.

The average consumer does not give a pass to companies because they distinguish themselves as a software company.  All the average consumer knows is that Verizon, AT&T, and other carriers said "its not me, its RIM's fault".  Sounds like a group of carriers who know the wrath of consumers.

The FCC will step in if it happens again on the same scale as it just occurred.  

As someone who lived through two service disasters, one fire related, trust me when I say heads will roll.  Back then the phrase, "its not my fault" fell on deaf ears.  Come to think of it either you can say consumers were screaming so loud they drowned out the pleas for mercy (from phone company management) or you can say that when this many people's businesses and personal lives depend so much on a service then someone will be sacrificed to the screaming consumer.
PJLouis PJLouis
12/25/2009
I agree that RIM is at fault, but what does the FCC have to do with it?   So, if we follow your way of thinking the FCC should regulate Google, Facebook & Twitter?  They are also communication applications that run on the Verizon network.   

The outage that you experienced was not due to a faulty Carrier Network (which should be regulated by the FCC), but a software glitch on a third party software application.   

I wouldn't hold my breath on the FCC helping you keep your email service (Blackberry) running.

gdt gdt
12/26/2009
I believe the FCC needs to be involved with regulating Google, Facebook, and Twitter.  As I have indicated in the past, the Googles and the Facebooks of the wolrd are rapdily becoming the primary means of communication for people.  Hence, both need to be subjected to some form of regulation. 

Recently (October 14, 2009), AT&T sent the Sharon Gillett, Chief of the FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau a letter where it outlined its case against Google’s effort to launch its own voice business outside of Titles I and II of the Telecom Act of 1996 and change net neutrality rules in Google’s favor.  AT&T’s letter has a subject heading of:  "Google Voice; Establishing Just and Reasonable Rates for Local Exchange Carriers, WC Docket No. 07-135; Broadband Industry Practices, 07-52"

AT&T's presented a set of well thought out arguments for handcuffing Google now.

I do not agree with any carrier that it automatically operates outside of the Telecom Act as a carrier simply because your network is Internet-based.  In today’s environment, voice is simply nothing more that non-text data but still data.  Voice is a staple service and an infrastructure service.  When I say voice is an infrastructure service I am referring to its critical nature in a society; you cannot live without it.

Any carrier supporting voice should be treated as a common carrier.  The provisions within the Telecom Act of 1996 are designed to protect the consumer from predatory and irresponsible carriers seeking to dodge their obligation to the telecom public.  For all practical purposes, telecom is not a privilege but a right.  For those old enough to remember the 2nd Avenue Fire in 1975 of New York Telephone Company, the Hinsdale network outage circa 1985, and the Bushwick Avenue fire circa 1986, the events that followed these events would have long lasting affects on how telecom would be perceived.  Just ask all of the people who could not use their phones to call for help.

Note that I treat current and emerging infocom services as telecom services.  Rather than a telephone you have a cell phone or a computer.

As for RIM's problem you miss the point.  If ISP based servcies becomes the prinicpal form of communications, then legal accountability is needed. As for RIM's problem being caused by a third party - TOUGH!!!  

Telecom and infocom are infrastructure services and therefore need to have some form of regulatory oversight.  Think of the early days of web surfing; back then it was the wild west.  Entrepreneurs felt no responsibility to police who used the web.  Finally we (as an industry) ended up dealing with wackos and pedophiles.  Early entrepreneurs denied any responsbility until someone got hurt then suddenly laws were written to protect adults and children.  It is amazing when threat of jail time gets you cooperation.

Will Facebook and Twitter transform their business and services?  I have no idea but as far as I am concerned if the company is an information services provider you need to operate along a set of minimum standards for performance.  Will Facebook and Twitter provide two way voice communications?  Why not?  Texting is two way communications.

The FCC and primarily the various state PSCs have been responsible for maintaining network reliability and service reliability in this country for decades (even long before the 1983 AT&T Divestiture).   So I am not sure where this feeling the regulatory agencies cannot do the job. In the past, state PSCs (and to some extent the FCC) ensured service quality.  Can you imagine new media companies doing whatever they wanted without thought to maintaining minimum service quality.If companies like Google and Facebook want to become the primary means of teleocmmunications for all people then they better deal with all that comes with being a provider of telecom services.

I have lived in the regulated and current deregulated environment.  There are pros and cons to both.  A balance needs to be achieved otherwise the consumer will lose out.

After personally living through a few network and service outages there is nothing that will convince me otherwise.
PJLouis PJLouis
12/26/2009